Systematic review of tailored dietary advice and dietitian involvement in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading public health concern globally. Interdisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation programs exist and should ideally consider nutritional health impacts since the nutritional status of COPD patients is often compromised. However, little is known about the role of dietary counseling in COPD management. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does providing tailored dietary advice to adult patients with COPD improve outcomes? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review. The following electronic databases and registrars were used: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The original search was conducted in June 2021 with an updated search conducted on February 21, 2024. Validity and bias assessments were completed. RESULTS: We selected 14 articles for inclusion. Multiple outcomes were considered including functional, body composition, nutritional intake, cost analyses, quality of life, and others. The most common measured outcomes were quality of life and the 6 min walk test. A number of interventions were used with most interventions being interdisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation packages where nutrition counseling was one component. A number of interventions showed positive results but there tended to be inconsistency. INTERPRETATION: Evidence shows that various interventions appear to improve outcomes, but it is difficult to determine if improvements are due to nutritional intervention specifically or a rehabilitation program as a whole. More specific randomized controlled trials should be completed regarding tailored nutritional counseling and therapy in adults with COPD to determine the benefits attributable to nutritional interventions.

A Pilot Replication Study of Implementing an Equine-Assisted Services Program Within a VA Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment Program.

INTRODUCTION: Veterans have high rates of substance use disorders and other mental health conditions including post-traumatic stress disorder. Effective treatments for these conditions exist; however, high attrition rates and residual symptoms after completing treatment are common. Complementary treatment approaches could enhance treatment engagement and/or response among this population. We previously reported a study of one such intervention, an equine-assisted learning, and psychotherapy incorporating horses intervention provided to veterans admitted to a Veterans Health Care Administration residential substance abuse treatment program. The first aim of this study was to replicate the previous study assessing the safety, feasibility, and preliminary outcomes of this intervention. The second aim was to examine the effect of participants attending multiple intervention sessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were 94 veterans who participated in one to six sessions of a 3-4-hour program consisting of both equine-assisted learning and psychotherapy incorporating horses. Pre- and post-session administration of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Craving Experience Questionnaire was utilized to assess changes in affect, anxiety, and craving. Wilcoxon signed-rank or paired two-tailed t-tests were utilized for pre- to post-session comparisons of the outcome measures for sessions 1-4. Generalized linear mixed-effects (GLME) models were constructed to determine the impact of dosage. GLME models were constructed to determine the impact of dosage. RESULTS: As with our previous study, the intervention was safe and feasible to utilize for this population. There were statistically significant pre- to post-session improvements, with medium-to-large effect sizes, for sessions 1-3 for negative affect and sessions 1 and 2 for positive affect, anxiety, and craving. The GLME models revealed no statistical significance for any of the predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, this study and our previous investigation of this equine-assisted services intervention suggest that it is safe and feasible to utilize for veterans admitted to a residential substance abuse treatment program and we have now found short-term benefits in two separate studies. Thus, a randomized controlled trial of this intervention is warranted to demonstrate cause and effect and determine whether longer-term benefits are associated with the intervention. The finding that there was no additional benefit from attendance at more than two intervention sessions suggests that dose-response relationship studies of equine-assisted services interventions for veterans are needed.

A pilot observational study of horsemanship skills training for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Pilot assessment of an equine-assisted services intervention for Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: A large Veterans Administration healthcare system. INTERVENTION: Two sessions of instruction in horsemanship skills and two sessions of trail rides. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety and feasibility of recruitment, retention, providing the intervention, and measuring outcomes, as well as acceptability of the intervention to the population studied were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: There were no injuries among the 18 participants, 6 staff, or 11 equines over the 3 months of the study. Eleven of 12 (92 %) planned intervention sessions were provided, with one being canceled due to weather. Out of approximately 1800 potential subjects, 21 were enrolled within three months and three dropped out before the first session. The mean number of sessions attended was 3 % and 52 % of participants completed all sessions. The mean PACES score for all sessions together was 109 (SD = 12), with a range of 50-126. Pre- to one-month post-intervention exploratory results indicated increased psychological flexibility (p = 0.008) and positive affect (p = 0.008) as measured by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale, respectively as well as decreased PTSD (p = 0.001) and depressive symptoms (p = 0.017) as measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM 5 and the Beck Depression Inventory, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the intervention can be conducted with minimal risk. Further, it was feasible to recruit participants as well as provide the intervention and measure exploratory outcomes. Session attendance and PACES scores indicate acceptability to the Veteran population. The exploratory results will provide sample size estimates for future randomized controlled studies of this intervention Future studies should plan for missed sessions due to weather and consider compensating subjects to enhance retention. Finally, this work provides preliminary evidence that this intervention, without a mental health treatment component, might benefit the mental health of Veterans with PTSD.